Home · Agentic solutions · Agentic regression testing: SAP checked every night

Case study · IT & quality

The tests that never finish before go-live

Agentic regression testing: SAP checked every night

Instead of three people clicking for two days — UiPath test agents walk the critical SAP paths every night. In the morning a report waits on Teams: what works, what broke, where to look.

20%of critical SAP paths is what this example company's manual regression covers — because there is never time for more before go-live.

Executive summary

The challenge

30 SAP transports a month; manual regression: 3 people × 2 days, ~20% coverage.

What changes

Test agents generate and execute scenarios nightly; people analyse deviations only.

Business value

4× the coverage with less effort; releases stop breaking production.

Systems & scope

SAP (ECC/S4), UiPath Agentic Testing / Test Cloud, Teams.

Illustrative scenario

A company with SAP at its core, 30 transports a month

Every SAP change can break invoicing, warehousing or payroll. Manual regression is 3 people for 2 days — 90 hours a month — and still covers only the essentials.

Under deadline pressure the tests get trimmed. Then production stalls on a Wednesday morning and the team hunts the guilty transport. Everyone knows this script — and that it will play again.

The current reality

  1. HumanThe team plans regression for the upcoming release
  2. Human3 people click through scenarios for 2 days
  3. WaitingDeadlines bite — some tests fall out of scope
  4. Error riskThe release ships with ~20% coverage
  5. Error riskThe defect surfaces in production — in front of customers
  6. HumanFirefighting and a rushed hotfix
HumanWaitingError risk

The hidden cost of the current process

The most expensive test is the one that never ran.

  • 90 hours a month of manually clicking through test scenarios.
  • Post-release failures: stalled invoicing counts in tens of thousands, not tester-hours.
  • Fear of change: teams postpone SAP improvements because regression cannot keep up.

The cost of doing nothing

A year of manual regression≈ 43 200 €
3 years — the same 2 days of clicking≈ 129 600 €
Production failures after releasesoutside this model

Manual work is an operational tax: the automation investment is finite, the manual cost is paid again every month.

The process after automation

  1. AutomationThe test agent reads the transport scope and picks scenarios
  2. AutomationGenerates missing cases and test data
  3. AutomationRuns the regression nightly in Test Cloud
  4. AutomationA morning report on Teams: pass/fail, screenshots, root-cause pointers
  5. HumanA human analyses only the deviations and calls the release
HumanAutomation

What the automation handles

  • Generating and maintaining test scenarios
  • Nightly regression of critical SAP paths
  • An evidence-rich report: screenshots, logs, inputs

When a human decides

  • The go/no-go release decision
  • Deviation analysis and fix priorities
  • Defining the critical processes to cover

Before

Critical-path coverage~20%
Regression frequencybefore releases
Manual work / month~90 h
Defect discoveryin production

After

Critical-path coverage~80%
Regression frequencynightly
Manual work / monthdeviation analysis
Defect discoverybefore the release

Value model — example assumptions

Illustrative model
30 transports × 180 min of manual regression= 90 h / month
90 h × €40 tester-and-consultant cost= €3,600 / month
12 months× 12
The annual cost of manual testing alone≈ 43 200 €

Business benefits

  • Coverage grows from ~20% to ~80% — with less manual work
  • Defects surface at night in test, not in the morning in production
  • SAP releases stop being a weekend lottery
  • The test team analyses and designs instead of clicking

Board-level KPIs affected

Release stabilityTest coverageTime to releaseIncident cost

What management gains

  • A daily, objective health picture of critical SAP processes
  • Release decisions based on a report, not on courage
  • A release-quality history — hard leverage with change vendors

Estimate it for your organisation

hours released per month
annual capacity released

An illustrative estimate based on your inputs. A model of released capacity — not a savings promise.

Systems in this scenario

Inputs

  • Transporty SAP (zakres zmian)
  • Scenariusze i dane testowe
  • Kalendarz wdrożeń

Mientha agentic layer

  • UiPath Agent Builder
  • UiPath robots
  • Maestro™ · Action Center

Core systems

  • SAP ECC / S/4HANA
  • UiPath Test Cloud
  • Teams (raporty)

Human approval: Teams / Action Center

What we deliver

  • A critical-path map of SAP with process owners
  • Regression scenarios generated and maintained by agents
  • Nightly Test Cloud runs with managed test data
  • A morning pass/fail report on Teams with evidence
  • A pilot: regression for one upcoming change
  • Coverage growth every sprint, risk-first

What we need to start

  • The critical SAP process list (10–15 to start)
  • Access to the SAP test environment
  • Sample test data or approval to generate it
  • The upcoming transport calendar

Implementation roadmap

Discovery

We map the process, data and exceptions with process owners.

Design

Target flow, business rules, approval thresholds.

Build

Agents, robots and integrations in your environment.

Validate

Tests on real cases, exception handling.

Go-live

Controlled rollout with human oversight.

Optimise

Monitoring, reporting and continuous improvement.

Typical duration depends on systems and rules — a single process is usually weeks, not quarters.

Risk and controls

Autonomy under control

  • Tests run only in the test environment — production untouched
  • Every result evidenced: screenshot, log, inputs
  • The release decision always stays with a human
  • Scenarios versioned — a full test-change history

Why now

  • Every month is ~€3,600 of clicking and another release at ~20% coverage
  • SAP change velocity is rising — S/4, integrations, patches; manual regression cannot keep up
  • Agentic testing has matured: scenarios generate from processes, not recordings

Why this matters to:

CIO

Releases follow the calendar, not the team's nerve.

COO

Invoicing and the warehouse stop dying on post-transport Wednesdays.

CFO

Production-failure costs fall; testing costs become flat and predictable.

Questions we usually hear

“We have recorded test scripts.”

Recordings crumble at every screen or data change. Agents build scenarios from process logic and keep them aligned with change themselves.

“Will our testers lose their jobs?”

They will change jobs: from clicking to case design, risk analysis and decisions. Agents take the night clicking — humans keep the morning analysis.

“Our SAP is heavily customised.”

That is why scenarios come from your processes, not templates. The more customisation, the more regression pays — nobody breaks the standard for you, your extensions do break.

When this may not be the right solution

  • A near-vanilla SAP with a handful of transports a year
  • No test environment — build that first, automate second
  • Critical processes not even listed — we would start with the map, not the tests

A question for your next board meeting

If tonight's regression covered 80% of your critical paths — which risk would stop waking you up?

What did the last failure after an untested SAP transport cost you?

Give us one upcoming SAP change — we will build its regression and show you the first night's report.

Request a one-change regression pilot

Related automations